![]() ![]() If you’ve ever played Resident Evil 1 it’s a lot like solving that mansion but instead of zombies it’s ghostsĮternal ring is a lot like the kings field series especially, but I found everything much more bland for some reason. More survival horror with limited resources.Įcho night has really fun exploration and puzzles, but basically no combat. The shadow tower series is also great, but a good bit different than kings field. This also has some of the best npc and quest stuff in the series, but I would save it for last out of the trilogy. ![]() KFIII also has more self contained levels, but has a lot of them and they are more diverse. King’s Field IV was developed and published by FromSoftware in Japan in 2001 for the PlayStation 2.It was later released as King’s Field: The Ancient City in North America in 2002, and in Europe (as simply King’s Field IV) in 2003.It is another first-person RPG and is the fourth and final game in the King’s Field series. Still great but more primitive than you might want. ![]() KFI has some great exploration as well, but it’s 5 smaller self contained levels none of which have any verticality. It even says stuff like 'Lord Myus sword is still on the battlefield' or something similar. Your character then sums up the information in his journal as the game progresses. It’s one giant interconnected map that’s just incredible. For Kings Field: The Ancient City on the PlayStation 2, a GameFAQs message board topic titled 'Do you need the moonlight sword to finish the game'. If you want the one with the most similar style of map exploration and a variety of weapons I’d start with KFII ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |