![]() ![]() ![]() I have asked many of these people and dived in to gather some key points. And there are many independent artists, personals and learners who still pays 100s of dollar to proprietary software companies in order to do their jobs. Yet still people crack proprietary products and use them drawing stick figures and memes. I live in a country where Adobe, Corel products are not directly available. So why don’t people just start using Krita, or switch to it? There are many people switching to it but not many. Krita is among those great tools that enables an artist to create masterpiece without constantly fearing about recurring payments, non-focused / invasive workflow, forcing to be inside a closed software ecosystem. These programs (Krita, Inkscape, GIMP and many others) are growing faster with the help of strong FOSS companies like KDE and a broad community consisting of thousands of developers, testers and maintainers. But it isn’t only costs that makes open source software like Krita a better choice for creative people and companies but there are hundreds plus other reasons. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |